Well this blog is kind of morphing into a place for sharing ideas that will hopefully guide our WiredWednesday conversations.  It wasn’t the vision and it needs more time, but i just don’t have it right now.  I do want to share this though as it is one of the more powerful things i have seen recently:

This video was posted on a friends FaceBook last night and will serve as a wonderful place for us to connect with during our WiredWednesday (or any other time!) discussion.  He posted saying that it was essential viewing for all educators:

Which of Gardners intelligences do you see being more/less important in the next two years?  what about the next 10 or 20?  Does this effect what you do (or should do) in your classroom?  How?

In the comment field of this post please let me know ways that you feel the presentation that you saw today could be improved upon.  I appreciate your honesty and attendance today,

thanks,
mistermark

This was shared on twitter by Jenny today and i absolutely love it.  It hit me on a day that i am grading the senior class’ responses to Social Media Revolution; their first writing for me.  Many of their responses are fantastic and many were written because they assumed they knew what i (the teacher) wanted to hear – this is something we will continue to work on.  I found Zittrain inspirational and (like so many TEDers) a fascinating and captive speakers…i also found in his talk, the follow up to my seniors’ blog posts.

I have to be honest, i don’t like teaching typing.  Yes, i admit i am thankful i learned how to do it in school.  I just think it is incredibly short sighted to think that today’s students will interact with their computers in this way.  Speaking of interacting with computers…

 This article was sent to me by a former colleague today When Computers Leave Classrooms, So Does Boredom it is a great piece that reminds us that technology needs to support a greater pedagogical shift and reminds us that good teachers are absolutely irreplaceable.  Take a read, and don’t miss the links on the right hand side under “past coverage.”

more Ted Talks, more good stuff…

Again, teachers what does this lecture have to do with your class and what you are doing to motivate your students? What about how you are motivated?

It is a popular word around this time of year and if you don’t know why you will have to see it.

Ran into this on FaceBook today, wow:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIFYPQjYhv8

TEACHERS how does this video affect what you are going to do in your classes?

Lots of changes, new country, school, job, staff to work with, students to learn from, apartment, and the list goes on and on…

Our book club got together last night to discuss a couple of titles; one of these titles was David Moody’s Hater.  The general response from our group was not positive; i would not say any of us were “fans”.  Thus a lot of our discussion focused on: if our whole group felt this way, how could this book be the huge best seller that it was/is?  Why had all of us forked over the money for the hard covered version?  Originally published on a blog Hater blew up on/in cyberspace and screamed up best seller’s lists all over the world.
With our book club’s discussion still on my mind, i walked into work today and glanced over the posts on my facebook page..on one of them was this article:

(reprinted from:  http://www.wired.com/techbiz/people/magazine/17-06/st_thompson with thanks to Justin for directing me to it)

Clive Thompson on the Future of Reading in a Digital World

By Clive Thompson 05.22.09

Illustration: Michael Bierut/Pentagram; book: Istock Photo

When McKenzie Wark wrote Gamer Theory—an analysis of why people enjoy playing videogames—Harvard University Press published it as a conventional hardcover. But Wark also put it online using CommentPress. The free blog theme blew the book open into a series of conversations; every paragraph could spawn its own discussion forum for readers.

Sure enough, hundreds dove in, and pretty soon Gamer Theory had sparked erudite exchanges on everything from Plato’s cave to Schopenhauer’s ideas on boredom. It felt as much like a rangy, excited Twitter conversation as it did a book. “It was all because we opened it up and gave readers a way to interact with each other,” Wark says. “It changed the way they read the book.”

Books are the last bastion of the old business model—the only major medium that still hasn’t embraced the digital age. Publishers and author advocates have generally refused to put books online for fear the content will be Napsterized. And you can understand their terror, because the publishing industry is in big financial trouble, rife with layoffs and restructurings. Literary pundits are fretting: Can books survive in this Facebooked, ADD, multichannel universe?

To which I reply: Sure they can. But only if publishers adopt Wark’s perspective and provide new ways for people to encounter the written word. We need to stop thinking about the future of publishing and think instead about the future of reading.

Every other form of media that’s gone digital has been transformed by its audience. Whenever a newspaper story or TV clip or blog post or white paper goes online, readers and viewers begin commenting about it on blogs, snipping their favorite sections, passing them along. The only reason the same thing doesn’t happen to books is that they’re locked into ink on paper.

Release them, and you release the crowd. BookGlutton, a site that launched last year, has put 1,660 books online and created tools that let readers form groups to discuss their favorite titles. Meanwhile, Bob Stein, an e-publishing veteran from the CD-ROM days, put the Doris Lessing book The Golden Notebook online with an elegant commenting system and hired seven writers to collaboratively read it.

Neither move should come as a surprise. Books have a centuries-old tradition of annotation and commentary, ranging from the Talmud and scholarly criticism to book clubs and marginalia. Stein believes that if books were set free digitally, it could produce a class of “professional readers”—people so insightful that you’d pay to download their footnotes. Sound unlikely? It already exists in the real world: Microsoft researcher Cathy Marshall has found that university students carefully study used textbooks before buying them, because they want to acquire the smartest notes.

The technology is here. Book nerds are now working on XML-like markup languages that would allow for really terrific linking and mashups. Imagine a world where there’s a URL for every chapter and paragraph in a book—every sentence, even. Readers could point to their favorite sections in a MySpace update or instant message or respond to an argument by copiously linking to the smartest passages in a recent best seller.

This would massively improve what bibliophiles call book discovery. You’re far more likely to hear about a book if a friend has highlighted a couple brilliant sentences in a Facebook update—and if you hear about it, you’re far more likely to buy it in print. Yes, in print: The few authors who have experimented with giving away digital copies (mostly in sci-fi) have found that they end up selling more print copies, because their books are discovered by more people.

I’m not suggesting that books need always be social. One of the chief pleasures of a book is mental solitude, that deep, quiet focus on an author’s thoughts—and your own. That’s not going away. But books have been held hostage offline for far too long. Taking them digital will unlock their real hidden value: the readers.

Email clive@clivethompson.net.

It seems really familiar to a discussion popular a couple years ago about how musicians would survive in a post-napster world doesn’t it?

I would really love to get your thoughts on this…

‘Tis the season of school surveys, class surveys, teacher evaluations, and a myriad of different question sets.  In this TED lecture Dan Ariely got me wondering how much of the responses we gather our determined by the question(s) we ask?

If you have issues with the embed (i did):  linked here.

As each day moves us closer to summertime and a chance for teachers make more of their “own” decisions i found this piece incredibly interesting.